# Are Bad Beat Jackpots Worth It? (Strategy With BBJ & High Hand Promotions)

On the off chance that our short-hand techniques for doing fast math likewise have adjusting mistakes, at that point the math on a given play can yield entirely unexpected outcomes dependent on what direction we adjusted.

We see basic adjusting mistakes all over the place. For example, the chances of getting managed AA PF are 220:1. Most bits of programming will in general round this to .5% (go plug AA into PokerStove, you will perceive what I mean). Different sources round it to poker online.

45%, which is more right than .5%. Be that as it may, a much progressively right number is .45248868778280542986425339366516%. While this probably won’t appear to be a gigantic adjusting mistake, it can change a ton of things in a \$EV condition. How about we take a gander at a model:

Let’s assume we know our rival raises 22+ (we’ll disentangle it to this fair so things don’t get excessively unpredictable). This would be 5.8823529411764705882352941176471% of hands (we as of now have an adjusting blunder here for the record in light of the fact that my adding machine won’t accomplish progressively decimal spots). We are thinking about 3betting this player expecting that he creases 22-99 and proceeds with TT-AA. We should take a gander at the basic and complex math:

So between the basic and complex structures we have a \$0.143181818181818181818181818184 contrast. Suppose over a 100K hand test size this sort of circumstance emerges multiple times. This implies there is a ~\$35.8 (.02PTBB/100 on our winrate) contrast in a greater example’s \$EV. What’s more, if this sort of spot game up 1K times in that 100K example it would be somewhat less than 1.5BI (.07PTBB/100) differential from this particular circumstance.

A similar math should be possible for open raise estimating. Let’s assume we are pondering taking and we think our adversary will overlay 80% of the time, and when he proceeds with we lose (once more, we need to hyper-streamline these circumstances on the grounds that the aggravated choices make discussing flop/turn/waterway contemplations unreasonably complex for this kind of article).